Table 1 test¶
Most clinical papers open their results with a Table 1, the table that describes who was in the study. The rows a researcher, a sponsor, or a regulator expects to see there are the rows your registry has to be able to fill, at a granularity they can use. This page goes with Chapter 1: name the users of your data first, then test your registry against a Table 1 they would recognize.
| Entry | |
|---|---|
| Registry | |
| Condition | |
| Completed by (role) | |
| Date | |
| Version |
Users of the data¶
List the people and organizations who will use your registry's data, and rank them. The most important user decides questions the others disagree on.
| Rank | User of the data | What they need from the data | How we know (a conversation, a publication, guidance) |
|---|---|---|---|
The published paper¶
Choose a natural history study or registry report in a condition related to yours, from PubMed.
| Entry | |
|---|---|
| Citation (authors, year, journal) | |
| PubMed ID or DOI | |
| Population and number of participants | |
| Why we chose this paper |
Row by row¶
Copy each row of the paper's Table 1, then mark whether your registry could fill it now.
| Row in the published Table 1 | How the paper measured it | Could we fill it now? (yes, partly, no) | What it would take | Which user needs it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Our own counts¶
Enrolled, confirmed, and evaluable are different counts. Every report says which one it uses.
| Count | Definition we use | Number | As of (export date) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enrolled | |||
| Confirmed (state the tier) | |||
| Evaluable for (name the analysis) |